INITIALIZING CONVEYOR...

Designing Production Line Through Operator Research

Prodrive Technologies · 2012 · Industrial Designer

Designing Production Line Through Operator Research

Prodrive Technologies · 2012 · Industrial Designer

Project at a Glance

The Challenge

Prodrive Technologies was evaluating whether to develop their own PCB conveyor system rather than relying on external suppliers. The goal: more control over their production line and potential product to sell to other manufacturers.

Before committing engineering resources, they needed to validate if an in-house system was feasible and actually better than existing solutions.

Problem

  • Conveyor line consists of parts from different brands
  • Limited control over customization and future modifications
  • Multiple specialized configurations required (scan units, cooling stations, inspection, reject stations)
  • Unclear if user needs could translate into manufacturable design

The Stakes & Constraints

Business Stakes

  • Strategic decision: build in-house vs continue buying external
  • Production line efficiency gains
  • Potential new product line for sales to other manufacturers

Technical Constraints

  • Stability: Heavy enough not to move when leaned against, yet transportable with standard pallet wagon
  • Manufacturing scalability: Platform must support multiple unit types (basic, scanner, cooling, inspection) from common base
  • Maintenance access: Electronics accessible from front (units often placed against walls)
  • Cleanroom compatibility: Cable management, easy cleaning, smooth surfaces

Phase 1: Understand the Real Problem

Started with on-floor operator research rather than jumping to CAD.

Method

  • Analyzed provided requirements list
  • Conducted short interviews with PCB conveyor operators on production floor
  • Observed actual usage patterns and pain points

Key findings from operators

  • Operators want leg room when sitting at conveyors for extended periods
  • Operators improvise solutions (tape to prevent light reflection, added weight for stability)
  • Conveyors move when operators lean against them and realignment is time-consuming
  • Need visual confirmation of PCB location in conveyor (or indicator when PCB present)
  • Scanner covers create access problems. Operators need hands free when carrying PCBs
  • Flat scanner covers become storage surfaces, making access difficult
Clutter accumulating on flat scanner surfaces

Clutter on flat surfaces.

Black ducttape applied to prevent light reflection

Black ducttape to prevent light reflection.

Difficulty seeing if PCB is present in conveyor

Hard to see if there is a PCB.

Cable clutter around conveyor systems

Cable clutter.

Operator needing leg room at conveyor station

Leg room required.

Phase 2: Design Decisions and Concept Drawings

Translated operator insights into platform architecture.

Platform approach: Common base architecture with unit-specific tops. This allowed different configurations (basic, scanner, cooling, inspection) to share tooling and assembly processes while meeting distinct functional needs.

Key Decisions

1 Prioritized operator ergonomics

Single-side pallet wagon access was sufficient for installation logistics, but lack of leg room affected daily comfort.

2 Dark interior surfaces eliminated light reflection

No more ducttape needed.

3 External cable ducting for clean appearance and maintenance access

4 Front removable back panel to access cable ducts

5 Sloped upper surface to discourage clutter

Concept sketches for base conveyor unit

Base conveyor unit

Scanner unit concept design

Scanner unit

Phase 3: CAD and Rendering

Base unit in SolidWorks and first render

SolidWorks CAD model of PCB conveyor

SolidWorks CAD model

Assembly line render showing multiple conveyor units

Assembly line render

Result

Prodrive's mechanical design department received a complete concept package ready for detailed development.

Impact

1 Complete Concept
5 Design Decisions
Operator Insights

Delivered

  • Operator insights translate to engineering specs. Real production floor problems (stability, ergonomics, improvised fixes) became concrete design requirements that engineering could work with.
  • Trade-offs were documented. Decisions like prioritizing ergonomics over two-side pallet access were recorded with rationale, giving stakeholders clear understanding of design choices.
  • Concept visuals to show stakeholders.

Ready to transform your innovation challenge?

Connect on LinkedIn